The newly installed head of the Justice Department, Matthew G. Whitaker, espoused views that a constitutional scholar called “internally contradictory” and “ignorant.”

BING NEWS:
  • U.S. House panel approves subpoena for acting Attorney-General Matthew Whitaker
    Acting Attorney General Matthew Whitaker will appear before the House ... and numerous hours to my preparation” and was looking forward to the hearing. He criticized the committee for prematurely and ...
    02/7/2019 - 4:29 am | View Link
  • The legal challenge to the acting attorney general’s appointment is a trap
    Even if Whitaker cannot serve as acting attorney general ... Supreme Court, and all other officers of the United States…but the Congress may by law vest the appointment of such inferior officers, as ...
    11/20/2018 - 6:05 am | View Link
  • Trump’s acting A-G will consult ethics advisers on possible Russian probe recusals, officials now say
    Acting U.S. Attorney General Matthew Whitaker will consult with ethics officials ... The city has four cases proceeding in court that name Sessions as a defendant, including one which led to an ...
    11/12/2018 - 1:56 pm | View Link
  • Acting Attorney General Matthew G. Whitaker Once Criticized Supreme Court’s Power
    WASHINGTON — The acting attorney general, Matthew G. Whitaker, once espoused the view that the courts “are supposed to be the inferior branch” and criticized the Supreme Court’s power to review ...
    11/8/2018 - 6:10 am | View Link
  • More
BING SEARCH:
  • Historical Bases of the Right To Keep and Bear Arms
    [ Back | Home ] [ Originally published as Report of the Subcommittee on the Constitution of the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, 97th Cong., 2d Sess.,The Right to Keep and Bear Arms, 45-67 (1982) ("Other Views"). Reproduced in the 1982 Senate Report, pg. 45-67.]. Historical Bases of the Right To Keep and Bear Arms
    04/19/2019 - 8:39 am | View Website
  • The Justice System and Aboriginal People
    ABORIGINAL JUSTICE SYSTEMS. Introduction The Argument for Aboriginal Justice Systems . Taking Control Social Cohesion Our Recommendation . American Indian Tribal Courts
    04/19/2019 - 1:37 am | View Website
  • Why was the Supreme Court case US v Lopez important
    The Supreme Court determined that the Gun-Free School Zones Act was unconstitutional as Congress passed it using the Commerce Clause of the US.
    04/19/2019 - 12:47 am | View Website
  • Joseph Shine Vs. Union of India | Latest Supreme Court ...
    Joseph Shine Vs. Union of India [Writ Petition (Criminal) No. 194 of 2017] Dipak Misra, CJI (For himself and A.M. Khanwilkar, J.) The beauty of the Indian Constitution is that it includes 'I' 'you' and 'we'.
    04/18/2019 - 7:51 am | View Website
  • Precedent
    In common law legal systems, precedent is a principle or rule established in a previous legal case that is either binding on or persuasive for a court or other tribunal when deciding subsequent cases with similar issues or facts. Common-law legal systems place great value on deciding cases according to consistent principled rules, so that similar facts will yield similar and predictable ...
    04/17/2019 - 12:02 pm | View Website
  • More
Welcome to Wopular!

Welcome to Wopular

Wopular is an online newspaper rack, giving you a summary view of the top headlines from the top news sites.

Senh Duong (Founder)
Wopular, MWB, RottenTomatoes

Subscribe to Wopular's RSS Fan Wopular on Facebook Follow Wopular on Twitter Follow Wopular on Google Plus

MoviesWithButter : Our Sister Site

More News