Digg Has Been Ransacked And Sprayed With Graffiti

The latest version of Digg - aka Digg v4 - is getting a lot of negative feedback from its users, especially the power users. They’ve lead a Digg Revolt by pushing articles from their rival, Reddit, to Digg’s homepage. Now, they’ve defaced the site’s comment system by littering it with anti-Digg comments.

Power users control 56% of the content that makes it to the homepage. This group tends to be on the nerdy/geeky side - and there’s nothing wrong with that. It’s a similar group to the audience for Slashdot.com when it was the most popular site of its kind (Digg had already usurped Slashdot in traffic by 2006). Nowadays, Slashdot looks like a mom-and-pop version of Digg, with the ability for users to vote stories up or down and sort them by time (recent, popular). Hey, if you can’t beat them, join them, right.

Digg (and Slashdot) serves news that geeks care about, but Digg’s founder Kevin Rose wants to go beyond this user base with the new release. He wants Digg to be the next Twitter or Facebook, when it comes to sharing web content. I can understand that. Digg started this industry. They’re the guys who got websites to use the Digg buttons to share news articles, images, and videos. Now, Yahoo Buzz, Twitter, and Facebook all have sharing buttons, and everyone of them is a lot bigger than Digg. It’s time for Digg to reinvent itself or get left behind in the dust, like Slashdot before it. Digg experienced huge traffic growth from its inception to 2009, according to Alexa. This year, traffic started dipping, and that’s probably a big reason for the new release.

I think their traffic plateaued because the big boys/gals - Facebook (Like, Share), Yahoo (Buzz), Twitter (Retweet), and recently Google (Buzz) - moved into this space. As soon as those sites moved into social content sharing, Digg’s growth flatlined. Maybe it’s grown as big as it could for this type of website. Now is probably the time to hold on to your dear users and focus on your niche - it’s a huge niche, btw. According to Compete, Digg had between 7-9M uniques/month in the U.S.; they claim to have 30M worldwide. It’s very difficult to go beyond your core users and extend your brand. What will probably end up happening with this newer version is that the brand gets diluted and becomes bland, like Yahoo Buzz, except without its traffic. If I wanted Yahoo Buzz, I’ll just go to Yahoo’s homepage. I go to Digg because I want to read news that nerds like me care about. I don’t think this version will be successful in getting Digg more users, but I have to give Kevin Rose credit for trying and being ambitious. You have to constantly refresh and tinker with your product, or it gets old.

Each time we did an upgrade to Rotten Tomatoes, the initial reaction had always been negative. I remember the first time we converted Rotten Tomatoes from flat html pages to a database-driven site, we had a ton of negative feedback. What we did to convert each and everyone of them was to respond to them directly on the message boards. We told them why certain changes were made, where to access previous features on the new site, and even incorporated many of their suggestions including reverting back some of the major changes. We gave them timely updates, and they were really happy in the end because they felt like they had a hand in shaping the new site. We followed the same process for each redesign/relaunch, except for the latest one because I and some of the original founders were gone by then. Kevin Rose is approaching it similarly by updating his users on his blog, except he hasn’t budged on reverting some of the major changes - namely, taking the power away from the power-users and allowing automated submissions.

I do notice that the homepage (aka “Top News”), in general, features less tech news. Overall, it’s less interesting news to me. It’s not as useful to me now, even after all of the Reddit attacks have been averted. Now, they’ve permeated through to the comments, most of which is a variation of “Digg v4 sucks, I’m heading over to Reddit.” Or “Why can’t I bury this spam?” Articles making the frontpage also seem to come more from users with few followers or digged articles. So far, I’m not impressed by the results from these newbies. I liked the results by the “popular” diggers. So what if they control most of what appears on the homepage? At least it’s stuff I would want to read. V4 is supposed to increase the number of diggs per article, but so far, the opposite is happening. I’m noticing less and less diggs on homepage articles, and the number of comments are fewer too. Kevin Rose said they have more sign-ups, but I think most of them are from users sticking in their feeds (automated submissions). To its credit, the “My News” tab does offer news that I care about, but like what some the users say, I could get a better version of this from my RSS reader or Twitter.

So far, I’m siding with the complaining users. I’ll give it some time to settle down first before making a final judgement. One of the major changes during the second version of Rotten Tomatoes was laying out the quotes in one column instead of three columns. Both critics and users complained vehemently, and we changed it within a week. They were happy at the end. Digg v4 might just have to revert to its old algorithm which produced better results. Built around that rather than try to de-emphasize it. Give users back the features they love. Or watch them defecate on the site before migrating to Reddit, which has experienced a traffic spike since Digg v4 launched.

It’s been a couple weeks, and the negativity still hasn’t stopped. Accounts from users who complained have been closed. Most of the comments for dugg articles are just trashing Digg. It’s getting downright ugly. The site looks like it’s been ransacked and sprayed with graffiti. The product is awful. How many more weeks can Digg keep this up without losing a significant portion of their users?


Digg v4: release, iterate, repeat.

They Can’t Go Back

Top 100 Digg Users Control 56% of Digg's HomePage Content

Alexa: Digg

Compete.com: Digg

Alexa: Reddit

Giddy Reddit Exec Explains How Reddit Ate Digg's Lunch

Sections:  business   note from the editor   
Topics:  digg   digg v4   facebook   google buzz   internet   new digg   reddit   redesign   social networking   technology   twitter   yahoo buzz   
  • Moved SimplePie File Caching to DatabaseMoved SimplePie File Caching to Database
    A while back, My ISP told me my backups took half a day to complete, which is too long. If anything goes wrong during that period, the process would have to start all over again, which happened quite often. The customer rep told me that my server had too many files, and even though they didn’t take up much disk space when added up, the process of copying each one of them takes a lot of time. More
  • Pixlr’s Online Image Editor, When All You Want To Do Is Resize An Image
    I was looking for a Chrome app that would allow me to resize images and came upon Pixlr’s online image editor. Open up their website on any browser (I’ve only used it on Firefox and Chrome), and you get a fast simpler version of Photoshop online. More
  • Bet On HTML 5 Kept Facebook from Entering Mobile Market Early
    I was reading an article on BBC about Facebook’s future and came upon the reason why the social network got into the mobile market so late. BBC has the answer from Facebook’s COO Sheryl Sandberg: More
  • Looks Like Facebook Home Is Not For Me
    There’s been lots of news lately regarding Facebook Home. I use Facebook on a daily basis, but I’m not sure if I want them to take over my phone. I don’t even want Google to take over my phone; the first thing I did with my new phone was get rid of their search bar. More
  • Got the Galaxy Note 2Got the Galaxy Note 2
    Ever since Samsung came out with the Galaxy Note, I was already interested. It has a 5.3” screen and a pressure-sensitive stylus. Because I use my phone mostly for web browsing, the larger screen allows me to see more of a website without zooming in and out. More
  • By far, StumbleUpon has been the most effective sharing button
    I'm finding that StumbleUpon has been the most effective social button on the site. I've been consistently sharing my blog entires on StumbleUpon and other content sharing sites like Digg, Reddit, Twitter, Linkedin, +1, Facebook, and maybe a couple other ones. More
  • The Only People Willing to Pay for Twitter Are Users with over 100K Followers
    So far, I’ve only heard of two people who are willing to pay for Twitter - Guy kawasaki and Roger Ebert. If you search on Google, you’ll probably find more, but those are the only two I’ve read about. They have one thing in common - they each have over 100,000 followers. More
  • Loving Google Buzz So Far
    Some features just make sense. Google Buzz is one of them. It's nothing new really. It's just Twitter integrated within GMail, and with commenting, it looks a lot like Facebook. More
  • Betaworks' Digg Relaunch Has One Fatal MistakeBetaworks' Digg Relaunch Has One Fatal Mistake
    Betaworks bought Digg, the website, for about half a million. It’s a complicated sale. Linkedin acquired the patents, and Washington Post got the talent (the engineers). The first thing Betaworks did was relaunch the site on August 1st. I noticed because their RSS feeds stopped working on Wopular. More
  • Finally, Replaced Digg with RedditFinally, Replaced Digg with Reddit
    I finally had to do it. I stuck with Digg for as long as I could. It’s the first social news site. Even after the infamous version 4, I stuck with them. A decent number of Digg's hardcore users had already jumped ship since v4. More


Comment On This Story

Welcome to Wopular!

Welcome to Wopular

Wopular is an online newspaper rack, giving you a summary view of the top headlines from the top news sites.

Senh Duong (Founder)
Wopular, MWB, RottenTomatoes

Subscribe to Wopular's RSS Fan Wopular on Facebook Follow Wopular on Twitter Follow Wopular on Google Plus

MoviesWithButter : Our Sister Site

More News