The decision said the proposed $48 billion deal violated antitrust law because it would create an unacceptable reduction in the number of companies serving large national employers that insure their workers.
WSJ.com: What's News US, Wall Street Journal
Wed, 02/08/2017 - 6:39pm
The decision said the proposed $48 billion deal violated antitrust law because it would create an unacceptable reduction in the number of companies serving large national employers that insure their workers.