Comment on Inside the Worst Three Weeks Trump’s Campaign

Donald Trump’s mention of illegal migrants eating pets in Springfield was a stroke of brilliance.

Force ABC to admit that it was an ambush, not a debate.

Richard Friedman: “Although I am a psychiatrist, I am not offering any specific medical diagnoses for any public figure. I have never met or examined either candidate. But I watched the debate with particular attention to the candidates’ vocabulary, verbal and logical coherence, and ability to adapt to new topics—all signs of a healthy brain.” “Although Kamala Harris certainly exhibited some rigidity and repetition, her speech remained within the normal realm for politicians, who have a reputation for harping on their favorite talking points.” “By contrast, Donald Trump’s expressions of those tendencies were alarming.

Fox News' Greg Gutfeld tried to rescue Trump from his terrible defeat at the debate by whining like a spoiled brat and claiming it was ABC's David Muir and Lindsay Davis who did the heavy lifting to help Kamala Harris win. Trump's surrogates and media minions all coalesced around ABC to try and shift the narrative away from Trump, the cat and dog man cometh. GUTFELD: Congratulating Kamala for the debate is stolen valor. It was Harris who gutted Trump like a stuck pig and not the moderators.

A lot of dire predictions, but no hard data to back it up—sound familiar?

For independents and undecided, some thoughts on who Trump is and why he should be elected.