Employers Can Force Retirement, Court Ruling Suggests

The court unanimously dismissed an appeal by a solicitor who was told to retire by a law firm just after his 65th birthday.Leslie Seldon, a partner at the firm, wanted to continue working, but his request was turned down.Read More... More on Retirement

Sections:  news   politics   business   
Topics:  employers   retirement   work   
RELATED ARTICLES
BING NEWS:
  • Employers must monitor 401(k) fees, Supreme Court rules
    A unanimous high court said Monday that employers can ... Others, though, see a major change. The ruling will send a "shock wave to the retirement-provider community and force them to discharge their fiduciary duties and protect people's savings," said ...
    05/18/2015 - 1:00 pm | View Link
  • Employers face list of potential rule changes
    But under a new NLRB ruling ... to unionize the entire work force at a factory, but just 90 people classified as assemblers, Malfitano said. The union lost by one vote. "Too close," he said. A case before the U.S. Supreme Court could change the way ...
    06/7/2012 - 12:34 am | View Link
  • Age discrimination: could employers enforce early retirement?
    Younger employees itching for promotion may, however, be able to breathe a sigh of relief after a recent court ruling which may still assist employers to legitimately force an ... Their aim will be to ensure age discrimination is not rife, while at the ...
    05/23/2012 - 1:00 pm | View Link
  • Employers must justify forced retirement on age grounds
    Employers cannot force employees to retire at 65 without a clear justification in each case after a ruling by the UK’s Supreme Court yesterday. Five justices ruled that Leslie Seldon, a partner in a Kent firm, had not been treated unfairly when ...
    04/25/2012 - 1:58 am | View Link
  • Employers can force retirement if in 'public interest'
    Employers can force retirement of older workers if it is in the "public interest", a landmark court ruling signalled on Wednesday. Companies could, for example, say they needed to dismiss older workers at 65 to make way for more entry-level jobs and ...
    04/25/2012 - 12:04 am | View Link
  • More
BING SEARCH:
  • Supreme Court: Some Employers Can Refuse To Cover ...
    As expected, one of the most anticipated decision of the Supreme Court’s October 2013 Term was handed down today. In Burwell v. Hobby Lobby and Conestoga ...
    05/22/2016 - 6:23 am | View Website
  • Ogletree Deakins :: Categories
    At Ogletree Deakins, we understand that clients have choices among labor and employment counsel. We represent employers of all sizes and across many industries, from ...
    05/20/2016 - 8:44 pm | View Website
  • Retirement Thought Leadership | Aon
    Aon Hewitt offers comprehensive expert insights related to Retirement Solutions for human resources professionals. Select from the topics below for lists of human ...
    05/20/2016 - 6:43 pm | View Website
  • United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
    Judges to Lead National Committees Chief justice appoints three judges from Ninth Circuit
    05/19/2016 - 9:43 pm | View Website
  • Economist: Government Preparing to Seize 401(k) Pensions ...
    Economist: Government Preparing to Seize 401(k) Pensions Supreme Court ruling sets the stage for "economic totalitarianism"
    05/19/2016 - 8:03 pm | View Website
  • More

Comment On This Story