Former President Donald Trump headed back to Wisconsin In the midst of another presidential campaign, officials in Donald Trump’s camp say the former president will be returning to Wisconsin. According to a release ... 04/25/2024 - 3:12 am | View Link
Donald Trump traveling to Wisconsin for first off-day rally from New York hush money trial Former President Donald Trump is scheduled visit Wisconsin in what will be his first rally since his criminal trial began in New York this month. 04/24/2024 - 12:22 pm | View Link
Donald Trump returning to Wisconsin next week for campaign event in Waukesha Officials said Trump will deliver remarks May 1 at the Waukesha County Expo Center at 2 p.m. Doors will open at 11 a.m. 04/24/2024 - 7:23 am | View Link
Former Obama adviser says RFK Jr. ‘trend lines’ look good for Biden The man who led former President Obama’s 2012 reelection campaign said early polling ... launched ads in the swing states of Michigan and Wisconsin on Monday that sought to cast doubt on Kennedy ... 04/23/2024 - 8:00 am | View Link
How Mike Johnson defied the Trumpists in Congress over Ukraine At a rally in Schnecksville, Pennsylvania, a fervid former president kept his audience rapt. Suburbs like this will soon decide the fate of America. 04/19/2024 - 12:04 pm | View Link
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson raised concerns about granting the president absolute immunity, suggesting it could foster criminal activity in the Oval Office. She questioned Trump's lawyer, D. John Sauer, on why presidents should not be required to follow the law when acting in their official capacity.
CNN's Brynn Gingras describes former President Donald Trump's demeanor in court during former publisher of the National Enquirer David Pecker's testimony as part of his criminal hush money trial.
Justice Amy Coney Barrett pressed Trump lawyer D. John Sauer during Supreme Court arguments on the distinction between official and personal acts alleged in the charges. University of Texas law professor Steve Vladeck shares his takeaway.
Can a President order a political rival’s assassination and avoid criminal prosecution? What if he sold nuclear secrets to a foreign adversary or staged a coup?
These are some of the hypothetical questions posed during oral arguments at the Supreme Court on Thursday as the Justices wrestled with the practical implications of what could happen if they grant former President Donald Trump immunity from criminal prosecution in special counsel Jack Smith’s election interference case against him.
[time-brightcove not-tgx=”true”]
“This case has huge implications for the presidency, for the future of the presidency, for the future of the country,” said Justice Brett Kavanaugh.
During nearly three hours of arguments in Trump v.
Former Edgewater police officer McKinzie Rees hopes to serve and protect again, but first she must get her name removed from a so-called “bad cops list” maintained by the Colorado Attorney General’s Office. It landed there, she said, as retaliation after she reported sexual assaults by a supervising sergeant.
That sergeant went on to work for another police department until this year, when he pleaded guilty to unlawful sexual contact and misconduct and was sentenced, more than four years after the assaults and retaliation against Rees.
She testified to the state’s House Judiciary Committee this week that, even after her attacker was exposed, her complaint about still being listed as a problem police officer “is falling on deaf ears every time.”
Rees’ testimony, echoed by other frontline police officers from Colorado Springs and Denver about retaliation they faced after reporting misconduct, is driving state lawmakers’ latest effort at police oversight.