Supreme Court will take up 'ghost guns' case next term The Supreme Court said Monday it would take up the issue of "ghost guns" next term and the Biden administration's appeal seeking to regulate the self-assemble weapons kits as any other firearm. 04/22/2024 - 3:55 am | View Link
Supreme Court agrees to hear dispute over Biden administration's "ghost guns" rule It noted that since 2017, there has been a 1,000% increase in the number of ghost guns recovered by law enforcement each year. The challengers to ATF's rule also urged the Supreme Court to decide ... 04/22/2024 - 3:17 am | View Link
Supreme Court will take up the legal fight over ghost guns, firearms without serial numbers The rule does not prohibit people from purchasing a kit or any type of firearm.The Justice Department had told the court that local law enforcement agencies seized more than 19,000 ghost guns at crime ... 04/22/2024 - 3:04 am | View Link
Supreme Court will take up the legal fight over ghost guns, firearms without serial numbers The rule does not prohibit people from purchasing a kit or any type of firearm.The Justice Department had told the court that local law enforcement agencies seized more than 19,000 ghost guns at ... 04/22/2024 - 3:04 am | View Link
Supreme Court Will Take up the Legal Fight Over Ghost Guns, Firearms Without Serial Numbers Supreme Court Will Take up the Legal Fight Over Ghost Guns, Firearms Without Serial Numbers WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court agreed on Monday to take up a Biden administration appeal over the ... 04/21/2024 - 10:36 pm | View Link
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson raised concerns about granting the president absolute immunity, suggesting it could foster criminal activity in the Oval Office. She questioned Trump's lawyer, D. John Sauer, on why presidents should not be required to follow the law when acting in their official capacity.
CNN's Brynn Gingras describes former President Donald Trump's demeanor in court during former publisher of the National Enquirer David Pecker's testimony as part of his criminal hush money trial.
Justice Amy Coney Barrett pressed Trump lawyer D. John Sauer during Supreme Court arguments on the distinction between official and personal acts alleged in the charges. University of Texas law professor Steve Vladeck shares his takeaway.
Can a President order a political rival’s assassination and avoid criminal prosecution? What if he sold nuclear secrets to a foreign adversary or staged a coup?
These are some of the hypothetical questions posed during oral arguments at the Supreme Court on Thursday as the Justices wrestled with the practical implications of what could happen if they grant former President Donald Trump immunity from criminal prosecution in special counsel Jack Smith’s election interference case against him.
[time-brightcove not-tgx=”true”]
“This case has huge implications for the presidency, for the future of the presidency, for the future of the country,” said Justice Brett Kavanaugh.
During nearly three hours of arguments in Trump v.
Former Edgewater police officer McKinzie Rees hopes to serve and protect again, but first she must get her name removed from a so-called “bad cops list” maintained by the Colorado Attorney General’s Office. It landed there, she said, as retaliation after she reported sexual assaults by a supervising sergeant.
That sergeant went on to work for another police department until this year, when he pleaded guilty to unlawful sexual contact and misconduct and was sentenced, more than four years after the assaults and retaliation against Rees.
She testified to the state’s House Judiciary Committee this week that, even after her attacker was exposed, her complaint about still being listed as a problem police officer “is falling on deaf ears every time.”
Rees’ testimony, echoed by other frontline police officers from Colorado Springs and Denver about retaliation they faced after reporting misconduct, is driving state lawmakers’ latest effort at police oversight.