Supreme Court May Uphold Part Of Arizona Immigration Law

Jan Brewer

In oral arguments, both liberal and conservative justices indicate they may maintain a provision of the Arizona law that tells police to check the immigration status of people they stop. WASHINGTON —U.S. Supreme Court justices strongly suggested they would uphold a provision in Arizona's tough immigration law that tells police to check whether people they stop for some other reason are in this country legally.

RELATED ARTICLES
  • Coalition on immigration bill clears first testsCoalition on immigration bill clears first tests
    The bipartisan coalition behind a contentious overhaul of immigration laws stuck together on a critical early series of test votes Thursday, turning back challenges from conservative critics as the Senate Judiciary Committee refined legislation to secure the nation's borders and offer eventual citizenship to millions living illegally in the United States. More
  • Obama to open middle-class jobs, opportunity tourObama to open middle-class jobs, opportunity tour
    Aiming to show he's still focused on creating jobs, President Barack Obama is beginning a series of quick trips around the country to resurrect ideas from his State of the Union address that became overshadowed by the intense debates over gun control, immigration and automatic spending cuts. More
  • U.S. plans to drop gray wolves from endangered list
    The planned ruling would eliminate protection for the top predators, but scientists and conservationists say the proposal is flawed. Federal authorities intend to remove endangered species protections for all gray wolves in the Lower 48 states, carving out an a exception for a small pocket of about 75 Mexican wolves in the wild in Arizona and New Mexico, according to a draft document obtained by The Times. More
  • Gun bill’s failure may help immigration legislationGun bill’s failure may help immigration legislation
    Here’s an odd political reality: The collapse of the gun bill in the Senate last week may well make the passage of immigration reform legislation slightly easier. “I think the continued intensity of the dysfunction of Congress on this [gun] vote will help immigration,” Democratic pollster John Anzalone said. More
  • Senator Says Boston Bombing Should Be Factor in Immigration Debate
    Senator Charles E. Grassley said, “Given the events of this week, it’s important for us to understand the gaps and loopholes in our immigration system.” More
BING NEWS:
  • IMMIGRATION: Supreme Court upholds part of Arizona law
    The U.S. Supreme Court decision to uphold part of Arizonaâ s immigration ... of the Arizona law ignited emotions on all sides of the immigration issue. Five states passed variations of the Arizona law, cities â " including some in the Inland area ...
    06/24/2012 - 1:00 pm | View Link
  • Supreme Court Appears Sympathetic To Some Parts Of Arizona Immigration Law
    President Obama has criticized the Arizona law, calling it a threat to “basic notions of fairness.” Should the court uphold any part of the law, immigration groups are likely to challenge it based on an argument that the court was not considering on ...
    04/26/2012 - 6:58 am | View Link
  • Supreme Court may uphold part of Arizona immigration law
    WASHINGTON —U.S. Supreme Court justices strongly suggested they would uphold a provision in Arizona's tough immigration law that tells police to check whether people they stop for some other reason are in this country legally. But several justices also ...
    04/26/2012 - 4:20 am | View Link
  • Justices seem to side with Ariz. immigration law
    WASHINGTON - Justices across the ideological spectrum appeared inclined to uphold a controversial part of Arizona’s aggressive 2010 immigration law, based on their questions Wednesday at a Supreme Court argument. “You can see it’s not selling very ...
    04/25/2012 - 9:01 pm | View Link
  • Supreme Court may uphold parts of Arizona's immigration law
    the Supreme Court seems prepared to uphold part of Arizona's controversial immigration law. This would allow some of the measures currently blocked by lower courts to be enforced. Furthermore, the justices strongly suggested they're not buying the Obama ...
    04/25/2012 - 5:54 pm | View Link
  • More
BING SEARCH:
  • Politics-govt
    The vote to elect Donald Trump to become the 45th President of the United States has been characterized by the Democrats and much of the media as the uprising of an ...
    11/27/2016 - 7:51 am | View Website
  • 2016 Presidential Candidates & Election News
    Get the latest political coverage of the 2016 presidential candidates and elections. Get updates on republican and democratic candidates, polls and more at ABC News.
    11/27/2016 - 5:28 am | View Website
  • Judgment Day 2016: The Future of the Supreme Court as a ...
    Judgment Day 2016: The Future of the Supreme Court as a Critical Issue in the 2016 Presidential Election
    11/26/2016 - 8:45 pm | View Website
  • Arizona v. United States
    Arizona v. United States, 567 U.S. ___ (2012), was a United States Supreme Court case involving Arizona's S.B. 1070, a state law intended to punish unauthorized ...
    11/26/2016 - 12:46 pm | View Website
  • Justice Joan Larsen Announces Campaign for Supreme Court
    Lansing, Mich. – Supreme Court Justices Joan Larsen and David Viviano announced today their candidacy for the Michigan Supreme Court in 2016.
    11/26/2016 - 4:03 am | View Website
  • More

Comment On This Story

Welcome to Wopular!

Welcome to Wopular

Wopular is an online newspaper rack, giving you a summary view of the top headlines from the top news sites.

Senh Duong (Founder)
Wopular, MWB, RottenTomatoes

Subscribe to Wopular's RSS Fan Wopular on Facebook Follow Wopular on Twitter Follow Wopular on Google Plus

MoviesWithButter : Our Sister Site

More News