Supreme Court May Uphold Part Of Arizona Immigration Law

Jan Brewer

In oral arguments, both liberal and conservative justices indicate they may maintain a provision of the Arizona law that tells police to check the immigration status of people they stop. WASHINGTON —U.S. Supreme Court justices strongly suggested they would uphold a provision in Arizona's tough immigration law that tells police to check whether people they stop for some other reason are in this country legally.

RELATED ARTICLES
  • Coalition on immigration bill clears first tests
    The bipartisan coalition behind a contentious overhaul of immigration laws stuck together on a critical early series of test votes Thursday, turning back challenges from conservative critics as the Senate Judiciary Committee refined legislation to secure the nation's borders and offer eventual citizenship to millions living illegally in the United States. More
  • Obama to open middle-class jobs, opportunity tour
    Aiming to show he's still focused on creating jobs, President Barack Obama is beginning a series of quick trips around the country to resurrect ideas from his State of the Union address that became overshadowed by the intense debates over gun control, immigration and automatic spending cuts. More
  • U.S. plans to drop gray wolves from endangered list
    The planned ruling would eliminate protection for the top predators, but scientists and conservationists say the proposal is flawed. Federal authorities intend to remove endangered species protections for all gray wolves in the Lower 48 states, carving out an a exception for a small pocket of about 75 Mexican wolves in the wild in Arizona and New Mexico, according to a draft document obtained by The Times. More
  • Gun bill’s failure may help immigration legislation
    Here’s an odd political reality: The collapse of the gun bill in the Senate last week may well make the passage of immigration reform legislation slightly easier. “I think the continued intensity of the dysfunction of Congress on this [gun] vote will help immigration,” Democratic pollster John Anzalone said. More
  • Senator Says Boston Bombing Should Be Factor in Immigration Debate
    Senator Charles E. Grassley said, “Given the events of this week, it’s important for us to understand the gaps and loopholes in our immigration system.” More
BING NEWS:
  • Justices Seem Sympathetic to Central Part of Arizona Law
    WASHINGTON — Justices across the ideological spectrum appeared inclined on Wednesday to uphold a controversial part of Arizona’s aggressive 2010 immigration law, based on their questions at a Supreme Court argument. “You can see it’s not selling ...
    08/21/2014 - 12:22 am | View Link
  • IMMIGRATION: Supreme Court upholds part of Arizona law
    The U.S. Supreme Court decision to uphold part of Arizonaâ s immigration ... of the Arizona law ignited emotions on all sides of the immigration issue. Five states passed variations of the Arizona law, cities â " including some in the Inland area ...
    06/24/2012 - 1:00 pm | View Link
  • Arizona Immigration Law Decision: Supreme Court Rejects Major Parts of Controversial SB 1070
    UPDATE: On Monday, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the federal government on 3 out of the 4 major issues, most notably declaring that the Arizona immigration law ... likely that the Court will uphold SB 1070, at least in part. The law’s most ...
    06/18/2012 - 1:57 am | View Link
  • Supreme Court may uphold part of Arizona immigration law
    WASHINGTON —U.S. Supreme Court justices strongly suggested they would uphold a provision in Arizona's tough immigration law that tells police to check whether people they stop for some other reason are in this country legally. But several justices also ...
    04/26/2012 - 4:20 am | View Link
  • Supreme Court may uphold part of Arizona immigration law
    WASHINGTON — U.S. Supreme Court justices strongly suggested they would uphold a provision in Arizona's tough immigration law that tells police to check whether people they stop for some other reason are in this country legally. But several justices also ...
    04/26/2012 - 12:10 am | View Link
  • More
BING SEARCH:
  • The Disastrous Consequences Of A Trump Supreme Court ...
    To: Interested Parties From: Elliot Mincberg, Senior Fellow, People For the American Way Date: September 9, 2016 Re: The Disastrous Consequences of a Trump Supreme Court
    02/28/2017 - 5:47 am | View Website
  • Supreme Court of the United States
    The Supreme Court of the United States is the highest federal court of the United States. Established pursuant to Article III of the United States Constitution in ...
    02/26/2017 - 9:45 am | View Website
  • Supreme Court strikes down Arizona law requiring proof of ...
    The Supreme Court on Monday struck down an Arizona law that requires people to submit proof of citizenship when they register to vote. The vote was 7-2. Justice ...
    02/24/2017 - 2:41 pm | View Website
  • Arizona v. United States
    Arizona v. United States, 567 U.S. ___ (2012), was a United States Supreme Court case involving Arizona's S.B. 1070, a state law intended to increase the powers of ...
    02/24/2017 - 9:33 am | View Website
  • Supreme Court Hardball
    “I am scared that if Ronald Reagan gets into office, we are going to see more of the Ku Klux Klan and a resurgence of the Nazi Party,” Coretta Scott ...
    02/17/2017 - 3:54 pm | View Website
  • More

Comment On This Story

Welcome to Wopular!

Welcome to Wopular

Wopular is an online newspaper rack, giving you a summary view of the top headlines from the top news sites.

Senh Duong (Founder)
Wopular, MWB, RottenTomatoes

Subscribe to Wopular's RSS Fan Wopular on Facebook Follow Wopular on Twitter Follow Wopular on Google Plus

MoviesWithButter : Our Sister Site

More News