In arguing that the case for President Trump’s removal was partisan and misleading, lawyers for the president omitted facts, presented claims that lacked context or downplayed evidence gathered by House investigators.
Elise Viebeck, Washington Post: Politics
Sat, 01/25/2020 - 3:45pm
In arguing that the case for President Trump’s removal was partisan and misleading, lawyers for the president omitted facts, presented claims that lacked context or downplayed evidence gathered by House investigators.