Earlier today, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in King v. Burwell, the conservative lawsuit aimed at destroying the Affordable Care Act over a speciously narrow reading of a single line in the law. But never underestimate Antonin Scalia's ability to be specious and narrow! Predicting the outcome of a major case based entirely on 90 minutes of chit-chat between lawyers and justices is folly, of course, but here are a few highlights, courtesy of SCOTUSblog and the Wall Street Journal. One hot topic in recent weeks has been whether the plaintiffs actually have a legitimate injury that would allow them to bring this suit in the first place, a legal concept known as standing.