Law enforcement officials said the opinion clears one major hurdle for the use of the cameras, but leaves another major concern unaddressed: where to draw the line between official transparency and personal privacy when it comes to responding to disclosure requests for body cameras under the state Public Records Act. Billig had asked the attorney general's office several questions about whether the use of the body cameras might run afoul of the state's Privacy Act, which bars the recording of most private conversations without the consent of all parties. Because the interactions are considered public, the attorney general said police departments don't need the consent of individual police officers or of the people they record. A body camera might have quickly helped answer questions about what happened during the fatal shooting of an unarmed black teenager in Ferguson, Missouri, over the summer — a shooting that has prompted months of protests and racial tensions — but the officer wasn't wearing one. The U.S.