The Nebraska Supreme Court ruled in favor of the couple Friday, agreeing that the man who sold them the building should have disclosed that he planned to take the building's doors with him. [...] a judge disagreed, saying the doors were not a trade fixture, defined as machinery or equipment used to carry on a trade, and ordered Solomon's business entity, Drew LLC, to the Griffiths $3,420, plus costs, to cover replacement of the doors. Solomon's appeal arguments were rejected Friday by the state's high court, which agreed with the judge that buyers have a reasonable belief that the interior doors are part of the purchase agreement. Solomon's failure to disclose his plan to remove the doors "amounted to a misrepresentation and a fraud," the lower court said, and that was reinforced by the fact that the doors remained in the building even after the purchase agreement had been signed and the dental practice had relocated.