Epistemic Injustice | search
Click here to view Epistemic Injustice news from 60+ newspapers.
Bookmark or Share- Epistemic Injustice - Philosophy - Oxford BibliographiesIn the book and subsequent papers (e.g., Fricker 2013, cited under Epistemic Injustice (“Testimonial,” “Hermeneutical,” and More) ), Fricker argues that there are two basic kinds of epistemic injustice, or two fundamental ways in which people can be wrongfully disadvantaged in their capacity as epistemic subjects.
- Epistemic Injustice | SpringerLinkBroadly conceived, the term “epistemic injustice” denotes two distinct yet related forms of injustice which, depending on the situation, undermine, undercut, disvalue, curtail, exclude, outright dismiss, or, in some cases, gaslight a person/or persons in their capacity as potential knowers.
- Epistemic injustice and epistemic positioning: towards an ...This article introduced the concept of epistemic positioning through which knowledge claims made by women and ethnic minority scholars are devalued in different forms of academic interaction, from citation to book reviews to appearances in the media.
- What Makes Epistemic Injustice an “Injustice”? - Wiley Online LibraryEpistemic injustice is the idea that we can be unfairly discriminated against in our capacity as a knower based on prejudices about the speaker, such as gender, social background, ethnicity, race, sexuality, tone of voice, accent, and so on.
- Epistemic injustice - WikipediaEpistemic injustice is injustice related to knowledge. It includes exclusion and silencing; systematic distortion or misrepresentation of one's meanings or contributions; undervaluing of one's status or standing in communicative practices; unfair distinctions in authority; and unwarranted distrust.
More
