A series: Fast-tracking injustice Yet a 15-month investigation by The Current shows that the lists of cases that may have been compromised by police wrongdoing have been forgotten. Hundreds of defendants were never informed about ... 04/25/2024 - 8:48 am | View Link
2021 death of young Black man at rural Missouri home was self-inflicted, FBI tells AP A federal investigation has concluded that a young Black man died of a self-inflicted gunshot wound inside a rural Missouri home, not at the hands of the white homeowner who had a his ... 04/24/2024 - 7:42 am | View Link
Jewish student protesters celebrate Passover Seder in encampments “And that’s really a guiding principle for me … recognizing where there is injustice and suffering and working to repair it any way possible.” At Passover Seders — when Jews traditionally gather to ... 04/23/2024 - 1:00 pm | View Link
State prepares enforcement action as medical waste incinerator faces mounting violations: 'What will it take?' "We will not tolerate unlawful practices that threaten the health and well-being of Maryland residents." State prepares enforcement action as medical waste incinerator faces mounting violations: 'What ... 04/19/2024 - 11:45 pm | View Link
Failure to address ‘ludicrous’ injustice of indefinite jail terms is ‘political cowardice’, peer warns Exclusive: Baroness Claire Fox warns leaders are ‘running scared’ from helping thousands trapped under abolished IPP sentences ... 04/19/2024 - 5:19 am | View Link
Thursday was a HUGE day in court for Donald Trump. TWO courts, actually. The Supreme Court in DC heard Donald Trumps "TOTAL IMMUNITY FOR LIFE" case and the New York Election Interference (Hush Money/Stormy Daniels) case continued with David Pecker on the stand for day 3.
First, the Supreme Court.
Some observations:
I can say with reasonable confidence that if you’re arguing a case in the Supreme Court of the United States and Justices Alito and Sotomayor are tag-teaming you, you are going to lose.
— George Conway (@gtconway3d) April 25, 2024
These are some of the most extreme, authoritarian arguments presented to the Supreme Court in the modern era.
Lousiana's Governor with what I would also call a self-own here, by defending the Republican bill with a colorful comparison. "I’ll give you a great example, when you go to a restaurant, do you go over there and watch the cook make everything he serves you? No, you just walk into a restaurant, those restaurants you that you think serve a great meal and you order that great meal.
Meet Mike Davis of The Article III Project, a right-wing outfit that backs Mr. Trump’s judicial nominees. Brett Kavanaugh described Davis as a "warrior" on his behalf. Yeah.
Now Davis has nothing to do but go on Bannon and make mouth noises regarding fantasies about prosecuting Barack Obama for murder.
Video and transcript via Media Matters:
MIKE DAVIS (ARTICLE III PROJECT): If the Supreme Court does not rule the right way and protects the presidency and therefore our country, that means the Trump 47 Justice Department can indict President Obama for capital murder, along with now-Judge David Barron on the First Circuit Court of Appeals, who was his legal advisor at the time, for their drone strike — extrajudicial drone strike — on two American citizens, including a minor.
During Thursday's Supreme Court hearing, Trump lawyer John Sauer was made to look foolish trying to defend his claim that the president would get immunity even if he assassinates his political rival.
Justice Sotomayor was not amused.
Sotomayor: Your answer below, I'm going to give you a chance to say if you stay by it – if the president decides that his rival is a corrupt person and he orders the military or orders someone to assassinate him, is that within his official acts for which he can get immunity?
Sauer: It would depend on the hypothetical, but we can see that could well be an official act.
Sotomayor: It could.
“The Department of Justice doubled down on its decision to not release the audio files of President Joe Biden’s interview with special counsel Robert Hur to House Republicans, stating that Republicans have not established a legitimate legislative purpose for demanding these recordings,” CNN reports.
“Even though we haven’t spoken, I still consider him a friend.”
— Former National Enquirer publisher David Pecker, quoted by the New York Times, as he testified against Donald Trump at his criminal trial.