The Supreme Court ruled that a $3.4 million award to a victim who had sought restitution from a man convicted of viewing images of her was too much, returning the case to the lower courts to find a different amount.
By ADAM LIPTAK, New York Times
Wed, 04/23/2014 - 11:20am
The Supreme Court ruled that a $3.4 million award to a victim who had sought restitution from a man convicted of viewing images of her was too much, returning the case to the lower courts to find a different amount.