For some twisted reason, the New York Times defines itself as Most Serious when they take shots at prominent Democrats, or when they're promoting war. This is dangerous for us, since there are still millions of people who take what the Times says seriously -- who saw a headline on the teevee news about their "blockbuster" that Hillary Clinton was the target of a criminal investigation and will never, ever see their timid followup that says, sure, we made a mistake, but Hillary Clinton was "asking for it" with her "secret email." Eric Boehlert at Media Matters: The unsettling question the Times now faces as it grapples with the fallout from the email debacle is whether or not the newspaper can be trusted to be an honest player when covering Clinton.