Buffalo Bills draft history: The great picks, the finds and the busts 1983 - QB Jim Kelly: The second of Buffalo's two first-round picks that year, he opted for the USFL and didn't arrive in Buffalo until 1986. Despite his late start he became the all-time Bills' ... 04/25/2024 - 3:51 am | View Link
How tough love (and disrespect) fuels Paolo Banchero "Coach, I promise you he won't call this house," she said. "This is not a soft place to land ... Devin Christopher for ESPN The Magic's identity has been built around grit on defense and joy on ... 04/25/2024 - 3:00 am | View Link
Biden grants clemency to Mississippi man convicted of non-violent drug offense President Joe Biden used his authority under the Constitution to “advance equal justice under law” by granting clemency to “deserving individuals” who were convicted of non-violent drug offenses, ... 04/24/2024 - 6:33 am | View Link
President Biden grants clemency to Albany woman convicted of non-violent drug offense President Biden has granted clemency to an Albany woman who has since served her time.Stacy Lynn Wilder, 49, pleaded guilty to a non-violent drug offense. Acc ... 04/24/2024 - 5:30 am | View Link
Biden pardons 11 people, commutes sentences of five others, says White House U.S. President Joe Biden on Wednesday pardoned 11 people and commuted the sentences of five others who had been convicted of non-violent drug offenses, the White House said, the latest in a series of ... 04/24/2024 - 5:24 am | View Link
Thursday was a HUGE day in court for Donald Trump. TWO courts, actually. The Supreme Court in DC heard Donald Trumps "TOTAL IMMUNITY FOR LIFE" case and the New York Election Interference (Hush Money/Stormy Daniels) case continued with David Pecker on the stand for day 3.
First, the Supreme Court.
Some observations:
I can say with reasonable confidence that if you’re arguing a case in the Supreme Court of the United States and Justices Alito and Sotomayor are tag-teaming you, you are going to lose.
— George Conway (@gtconway3d) April 25, 2024
These are some of the most extreme, authoritarian arguments presented to the Supreme Court in the modern era.
Lousiana's Governor with what I would also call a self-own here, by defending the Republican bill with a colorful comparison. "I’ll give you a great example, when you go to a restaurant, do you go over there and watch the cook make everything he serves you? No, you just walk into a restaurant, those restaurants you that you think serve a great meal and you order that great meal.
Meet Mike Davis of The Article III Project, a right-wing outfit that backs Mr. Trump’s judicial nominees. Brett Kavanaugh described Davis as a "warrior" on his behalf. Yeah.
Now Davis has nothing to do but go on Bannon and make mouth noises regarding fantasies about prosecuting Barack Obama for murder.
Video and transcript via Media Matters:
MIKE DAVIS (ARTICLE III PROJECT): If the Supreme Court does not rule the right way and protects the presidency and therefore our country, that means the Trump 47 Justice Department can indict President Obama for capital murder, along with now-Judge David Barron on the First Circuit Court of Appeals, who was his legal advisor at the time, for their drone strike — extrajudicial drone strike — on two American citizens, including a minor.
During Thursday's Supreme Court hearing, Trump lawyer John Sauer was made to look foolish trying to defend his claim that the president would get immunity even if he assassinates his political rival.
Justice Sotomayor was not amused.
Sotomayor: Your answer below, I'm going to give you a chance to say if you stay by it – if the president decides that his rival is a corrupt person and he orders the military or orders someone to assassinate him, is that within his official acts for which he can get immunity?
Sauer: It would depend on the hypothetical, but we can see that could well be an official act.
Sotomayor: It could.
“The Department of Justice doubled down on its decision to not release the audio files of President Joe Biden’s interview with special counsel Robert Hur to House Republicans, stating that Republicans have not established a legitimate legislative purpose for demanding these recordings,” CNN reports.
“Even though we haven’t spoken, I still consider him a friend.”
— Former National Enquirer publisher David Pecker, quoted by the New York Times, as he testified against Donald Trump at his criminal trial.