Lok Sabha Election 2024 2nd Phase Voting: Richest Candidate Has Rs 622 Crore, Poorest Has Just... The votes will be cast in all 20 Lok Sabha seats of Kerala, 14 of the 28 seats in Karnataka, 13 seats in Rajasthan, eight seats each in Maharashtra and Uttar Pradesh, seven seats in Madhya Pradesh, ... 04/25/2024 - 7:36 am | View Link
Lok Sabha Elections Phase IV: Congress’s Akshay Kanti Richest Candidate With Assets Worth ₹ 78 Cr Khandwa: Congress candidate Narendra Patel from Khandwa has a net worth of Rs 3.3 crore, comprising movable assets worth Rs 38 lakh and immovable assets worth Rs 2.9 crore; his BJP counterpart ... 04/25/2024 - 6:52 am | View Link
NewsRadio WFLA: Poorest Floridians Taxed at Higher Rate than Richest Californians Florida Policy Institute (FPI) and the Institute for Taxation and Economic Policy (ITEP) released a study today that found California’s tax system is fairer than Florida’s. 04/24/2024 - 4:55 am | View Link
A Fix for Tesla’s Troubles? Paying Elon a Cool $56 Billion, Of Course. There is, however, one positive by-product to Elon Musk’s determination to grab $56 billion from his shareholders and employees: It strengthens the case—growing stronger every day—for expropriating ... 04/24/2024 - 3:07 am | View Link
Richest candidate from BJP, poorest from KMSP Kolkata: In the second phase of the Lok Sabha polls in Bengal, a total of 47 candidates with an average asset of Rs 1. 04/23/2024 - 12:03 pm | View Link
Thursday was a HUGE day in court for Donald Trump. TWO courts, actually. The Supreme Court in DC heard Donald Trumps "TOTAL IMMUNITY FOR LIFE" case and the New York Election Interference (Hush Money/Stormy Daniels) case continued with David Pecker on the stand for day 3.
First, the Supreme Court.
Some observations:
I can say with reasonable confidence that if you’re arguing a case in the Supreme Court of the United States and Justices Alito and Sotomayor are tag-teaming you, you are going to lose.
— George Conway (@gtconway3d) April 25, 2024
These are some of the most extreme, authoritarian arguments presented to the Supreme Court in the modern era.
Lousiana's Governor with what I would also call a self-own here, by defending the Republican bill with a colorful comparison. "I’ll give you a great example, when you go to a restaurant, do you go over there and watch the cook make everything he serves you? No, you just walk into a restaurant, those restaurants you that you think serve a great meal and you order that great meal.
Meet Mike Davis of The Article III Project, a right-wing outfit that backs Mr. Trump’s judicial nominees. Brett Kavanaugh described Davis as a "warrior" on his behalf. Yeah.
Now Davis has nothing to do but go on Bannon and make mouth noises regarding fantasies about prosecuting Barack Obama for murder.
Video and transcript via Media Matters:
MIKE DAVIS (ARTICLE III PROJECT): If the Supreme Court does not rule the right way and protects the presidency and therefore our country, that means the Trump 47 Justice Department can indict President Obama for capital murder, along with now-Judge David Barron on the First Circuit Court of Appeals, who was his legal advisor at the time, for their drone strike — extrajudicial drone strike — on two American citizens, including a minor.
During Thursday's Supreme Court hearing, Trump lawyer John Sauer was made to look foolish trying to defend his claim that the president would get immunity even if he assassinates his political rival.
Justice Sotomayor was not amused.
Sotomayor: Your answer below, I'm going to give you a chance to say if you stay by it – if the president decides that his rival is a corrupt person and he orders the military or orders someone to assassinate him, is that within his official acts for which he can get immunity?
Sauer: It would depend on the hypothetical, but we can see that could well be an official act.
Sotomayor: It could.
“The Department of Justice doubled down on its decision to not release the audio files of President Joe Biden’s interview with special counsel Robert Hur to House Republicans, stating that Republicans have not established a legitimate legislative purpose for demanding these recordings,” CNN reports.
“Even though we haven’t spoken, I still consider him a friend.”
— Former National Enquirer publisher David Pecker, quoted by the New York Times, as he testified against Donald Trump at his criminal trial.