Paul Reubens Offers A Pee-wee Herman Film Update

http://dalderbash.wordpress.com/2013/05/19/movie-digest/ submitted by johndaltonmc [link] [comment]

submitted by theangel333 [link] [comment]

Hacking attempts on media organizations have ramped up in recent months with attacks on the AP, The Guardian, CBS News accounts, The Onion, and E! Online. On Friday The Financial Times’ Tech Blog and Twitter accounts were hacked into, the organization reported. “Various FT blogs and social media accounts have been compromised by hackers and we are working to resolve the issue as quickly as possible,” FT later Tweeted. Earlier in the week, The New York Times website experienced traffic slowdowns that limited access to some users because of online attacks not attributed to a specific group.

I've been going though a lot of movie watching lately and this stuck in my head. A lot of movies have the implied sex scene (kissing, groping etc) and then cut to the next scene forgoing the actual deed. Others however go full tilt into the act. So from a strictly personal viewpoint, do people here prefer an implied sex scene, shown sex scene or would you rather forgo the whole thing and just keep the movie going? My thoughts on the matter are scattered to be honest. I can understand a romance movie going full tilt but there are many movies where I find it's better to cut things short or completely skip it because I feel it's unnecessary to the actual movie. However I can't point to a specific movie. Possibly the Thomas Crown Affair as an example of it being unneeded. submitted by ThelVluffin [link] [12 comments]

submitted by THEpapaSmurf [link] [2 comments]