Uber's terms and conditions were not presented clearly enough, according to the ruling. Mike Blake/Reuters Massachusetts' highest court on Monday reversed a decision allowing Uber to settle a discrimination lawsuit in arbitration. The case was brought by Christopher Kauders, a blind man who was denied service by three Uber drivers because of his guide dog. Uber in 2018 won the right to settle the case in arbitration because its terms and conditions said it could do so, but the court ruled they hadn't been prominent enough to constitute a binding contract. Visit Business Insider's homepage for more stories. A Massachusetts court has told Uber it can't force a blind man who is suing the company for discrimination into arbitration because it presented its terms and conditions in way that meant he was unlikely to read them, Ars Technica reports.Plaintiff Christopher Kauders brought a discrimination case against Uber after three Uber drivers refused to give him a ride because he was accompanied by a guide dog.